1.
US CODE: Title 15,SUBCHAPTER V—DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES Communication in connection with debt collection; § 1692d. ... Relation to State laws; § 1692o. Exemption for State regulation; § 1692p. ...
2.
US CODE: Title 15,1681b. Permissible purposes of consumer reports For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 1751 of .... to section 604(c) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act [15 U.S.C. 1681b (c)], ...
3.
US CODE: Title 15,SUBCHAPTER V—DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES Communication in connection with debt collection; § 1692d. Harassment or abuse; § 1692e. False or misleading representations; § 1692f. ...
4.
US CODE: Title 15,1692. Congressional findings and declaration of ... Abusive debt collection practices contribute to the number of personal ... Abusive debt collection practices are carried on to a substantial extent in ...
5.
US CODE: Title 15,1692. Congressional findings and declaration of ... Abusive debt collection practices contribute to the number of personal bankruptcies, ... Existing laws and procedures for redressing these injuries are ...
6.
US CODE: Title 15,1692. Congressional findings and declaration of ... Abusive debt collection practices contribute to the number of personal bankruptcies, ... Existing laws and procedures for redressing these injuries are ...
7.
US CODE: Title 15,SUBCHAPTER V—DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES Communication in connection with debt collection; § 1692d. Harassment or abuse; § 1692e. False or misleading representations; § 1692f. Unfair practices ...
8.
US CODE: Title 15,1692. Congressional findings and declaration of ... Abusive debt collection practices contribute to the number of personal ... Abusive debt collection practices are carried on to a substantial extent in ...
9.
A&M RECORDS, INC. v. NAPSTER, INC., 239 F.3d 1004 (9th Cir. 2001) A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc., 114 F. Supp. 2d 896 (N.D. Cal. 2000). .... The Napster servers then communicate the host user’s Internet address to the ...
10.
A&M RECORDS, INC. v. NAPSTER, INC., 239 F.3d 1004 (9th Cir. 2001) The injunction was slightly modified by written opinion on August 10, 2000. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc., 114 F. Supp. 2d 896 (N.D. Cal. 2000). ...
|